Home / Professionnels - Orthopédie / Régénération du cartilage / AMIC Genou

AMIC® Chondro-Gide® - Genou

Informations générales AMIC Chondro-Gide AMIC Genou AMIC Talus AMIC Hanche Instruments Arthroscopiques AMIC AMMR Vidéos chirurgicales AMIC DataBank

Chondro-Gide Jubilé Chondro-Gide

AMIC® Chondro-Gide® est une méthode mini-invasive en une seule étape qui utilise la chondrogénèse autologue induite par matrice (AMIC®) combinée à l’application de Chondro-Gide® pour régénérer les lésions du cartilage de toutes dimensions. Étayé par plus de 10 ans de réussite clinique, AMIC® Chondro-Gide® est un traitement efficace et économique permettant de régénérer le cartilage endommagé du genou, d’atténuer ou de prévenir la douleur, et de ralentir la progression des lésions.

AMIC® Chondro-Gide® associe la technique des microfractures (MFx) à l’application de la membrane Chondro-Gide®, qui recouvre et protège à la fois le caillot fibrineux formé par la MFx et le tissu de réparation. Cette méthode peut être réalisée soit en « mini-open » soit par arthroscopie. Biocompatible et complètement résorbable, Chondro-Gide® accompagne le corps dans sa capacité à se régénérer lui-même.

Bénéfices

Grâce à sa structure bicouche unique, Chondro-Gide^®offre un environnement protecteur qui favorise la formation de tissu neuf. Membrane de collagène naturel bicouche I/III

Membrane de collagène naturel bicouche I/III
Biocompatible et résorbable naturellement
Facile à manipuler : souple et résistante
Peut être collée
Compatible avec différentes techniques de régénération des tissus
Procédure en une seule étape
Prête à l’emploi

Références:

SCHIAVONE PANNI, A., et al. Good clinical results with autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (Amic) technique in large knee chondral defects. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2018 Apr 26(4):1130-36 (Clinical study)
WALTHER, M., et al. Scaffold based reconstruction of focal full thickness talar cartilage defects. Clinical Research on Foot & Ankle, 2013, 1-5. (Clinical study)
KAISER, N., et al. Clinical results 10 years after AMIC in the knee. Swiss Med Wkly, 2015, 145 (Suppl 210), 43S. (Clinical study)
VOLZ, M., et al. A randomized controlled trial demonstrating sustained benefit of Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis over microfracture at five years. Int Orthop, Apr 2017, 41(4), 797-804. (Clinical study)
Geistlich Pharma AG data on file (Bench test)
GILLE, J., et al. Cell-Laden and Cell-Free Matrix-Induced-Chondrogenesis versus Microfracture for the Treatment of Articular Cartilage Defects: A Histological and Biomechanical Study in Sheep. Cartilage OnlineFirst, January 7, 2010, doi:10.1177/1947603509358721 (Pre-clinical study)
KRAMER, J., et al. In vivo matrix-guided human mesenchymal stem cells. Cell Mol Life Sci, Mar 2006, 63(5), 616-626. (Clinical study)
MITHOEFER, K., et al. The microfracture technique for the sustained benefit of Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis over microfracture at five years. Int Orthop, Apr 2017, 41(4), 797-804. (Clinical study)
GOYAL, D., et al. Evidence-based status of microfracture technique: a systematic review of level I and II studies. Arthroscopy, Sep 2013, 29(9), 1579-1588. (Review of clinical studies)
FONTANA, A., et al. Sustained five-year benefit of autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis for femoral acetabular impingement-induced chondral lesions compared with microfracture treatment. Bone Joint J, May 2015, 97-B(5), 628-635. (Clinical study)
GAO, L., et al. Early loss of subchondral bone following microfracture is counteracted by bone marrow aspirate in a translational model of osteochondral repair. Nature Scientif-ic Reports, 2017, 7:45189, DOI: 10.1038/srep45189 (Pre-clinical study)
FRANK, R.M., et al., Failure of Bone Marrow Stimulation Techniques, Sports Med Arthrosc Rev, 2017, 25 (1) (Review of clinical studies)
STEADMAN, J.R., Microfracture Technique for Full-Thickness Chondral Defects: Technique and Clinical Results. Operative Techniques in Orthopaedics. 1997. 7(4), 300-304. (Clinical study)
KAISER, N., et al. Clinical results 10 years after AMIC in the knee. Swiss Med Wkly, 2015, 145 (Suppl 210), 43S. (Clinical study)
VOLZ, M., et al. A randomized controlled trial demonstrating sustained benefit of Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis over microfracture at five years. Int Orthop, Apr 2017, 41(4), 797-804. (Clinical study)
SCHAGEMANN, J., et al. Mid-term outcome of arthroscopic AMIC for the treatment of articular cartilage defects in the knee joint is equivalent to mini-open procedures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, Jan 22 2018. (Clinical study)
STEINWACHS, M.R.,et al. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Clinical Evidence on the Use of Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis in the Knee. Cartilage. 2019:1947603519870846. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ pubmed/31508990 (Review of clinical studies)
FOSSUM, V., et al. Collagen-Covered Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation Versus Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis: A Randomized Trial Comparing 2 Methods for Repair of Cartilage Defects of the Knee. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine. 019;7(9):2325967119868212. doi.org/10.1177/2325967119868212 (Clinical study)

AMIC® Chondro-Gide® fait gagner un temps précieux

La détection précoce et le traitement par AMIC® Chondro-Gide® peuvent atténuer ou prévenir la douleur et ralentir la progression des lésions.

Références

SCHIAVONE PANNI, A., et al. Good clinical results with autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (Amic) technique in large knee chondral defects. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2018 Apr 26(4):1130-36 (Clinical study)
WALTHER, M., et al. Scaffold based reconstruction of focal full thickness talar cartilage defects. Clinical Research on Foot & Ankle, 2013, 1-5. (Clinical study)
KAISER, N., et al. Clinical results 10 years after AMIC in the knee. Swiss Med Wkly, 2015, 145 (Suppl 210), 43S. (Clinical study)
VOLZ, M., et al. A randomized controlled trial demonstrating sustained benefit of Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis over microfracture at five years. Int Orthop, Apr 2017, 41(4), 797-804. (Clinical study)
Geistlich Pharma AG data on file (Bench test)
GILLE, J., et al. Cell-Laden and Cell-Free Matrix-Induced-Chondrogenesis versus Microfracture for the Treatment of Articular Cartilage Defects: A Histological and Biomechanical Study in Sheep. Cartilage OnlineFirst, January 7, 2010, doi:10.1177/1947603509358721 (Pre-clinical study)
KRAMER, J., et al. In vivo matrix-guided human mesenchymal stem cells. Cell Mol Life Sci, Mar 2006, 63(5), 616-626. (Clinical study)
MITHOEFER, K., et al. The microfracture technique for the sustained benefit of Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis over microfracture at five years. Int Orthop, Apr 2017, 41(4), 797-804. (Clinical study)
GOYAL, D., et al. Evidence-based status of microfracture technique: a systematic review of level I and II studies. Arthroscopy, Sep 2013, 29(9), 1579-1588. (Review of clinical studies)
FONTANA, A., et al. Sustained five-year benefit of autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis for femoral acetabular impingement-induced chondral lesions compared with microfracture treatment. Bone Joint J, May 2015, 97-B(5), 628-635. (Clinical study)
GAO, L., et al. Early loss of subchondral bone following microfracture is counteracted by bone marrow aspirate in a translational model of osteochondral repair. Nature Scientif-ic Reports, 2017, 7:45189, DOI: 10.1038/srep45189 (Pre-clinical study)
FRANK, R.M., et al., Failure of Bone Marrow Stimulation Techniques, Sports Med Arthrosc Rev, 2017, 25 (1) (Review of clinical studies)
STEADMAN, J.R., Microfracture Technique for Full-Thickness Chondral Defects: Technique and Clinical Results. Operative Techniques in Orthopaedics. 1997. 7(4), 300-304. (Clinical study)
KAISER, N., et al. Clinical results 10 years after AMIC in the knee. Swiss Med Wkly, 2015, 145 (Suppl 210), 43S. (Clinical study)
VOLZ, M., et al. A randomized controlled trial demonstrating sustained benefit of Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis over microfracture at five years. Int Orthop, Apr 2017, 41(4), 797-804. (Clinical study)
SCHAGEMANN, J., et al. Mid-term outcome of arthroscopic AMIC for the treatment of articular cartilage defects in the knee joint is equivalent to mini-open procedures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, Jan 22 2018. (Clinical study)
STEINWACHS, M.R.,et al. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Clinical Evidence on the Use of Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis in the Knee. Cartilage. 2019:1947603519870846. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ pubmed/31508990 (Review of clinical studies)
FOSSUM, V., et al. Collagen-Covered Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation Versus Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis: A Randomized Trial Comparing 2 Methods for Repair of Cartilage Defects of the Knee. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine. 019;7(9):2325967119868212. doi.org/10.1177/2325967119868212 (Clinical study)

01/05

Technique chirurgicale en mini-open, description du Dr. M. Steinwachs

1. Mini-open: Préparer le champ opératoire

3. Mini- Open: Découper la membrane Chondro-Gide®

6. Mini-open: Fixer la membrane Chondro-Gide®

7. Mini-open: Positionner et coller la matrice Chondro-Gide®

8. Mini-open: Suturer à la place de coller

En adoptant une voie d’abord antérieure mini-invasive standard, ouvrir l’articulation du genou. Retirer le cartilage endommagé et instable à l’aide d’un scalpel, d’une curette ou d'une cuillère afin d’obtenir une lésion aux rebords perpendiculaires.

Références

SCHIAVONE PANNI, A., et al. Good clinical results with autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (Amic) technique in large knee chondral defects. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2018 Apr 26(4):1130-36 (Clinical study)
WALTHER, M., et al. Scaffold based reconstruction of focal full thickness talar cartilage defects. Clinical Research on Foot & Ankle, 2013, 1-5. (Clinical study)
KAISER, N., et al. Clinical results 10 years after AMIC in the knee. Swiss Med Wkly, 2015, 145 (Suppl 210), 43S. (Clinical study)
VOLZ, M., et al. A randomized controlled trial demonstrating sustained benefit of Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis over microfracture at five years. Int Orthop, Apr 2017, 41(4), 797-804. (Clinical study)
Geistlich Pharma AG data on file (Bench test)
GILLE, J., et al. Cell-Laden and Cell-Free Matrix-Induced-Chondrogenesis versus Microfracture for the Treatment of Articular Cartilage Defects: A Histological and Biomechanical Study in Sheep. Cartilage OnlineFirst, January 7, 2010, doi:10.1177/1947603509358721 (Pre-clinical study)
KRAMER, J., et al. In vivo matrix-guided human mesenchymal stem cells. Cell Mol Life Sci, Mar 2006, 63(5), 616-626. (Clinical study)
MITHOEFER, K., et al. The microfracture technique for the sustained benefit of Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis over microfracture at five years. Int Orthop, Apr 2017, 41(4), 797-804. (Clinical study)
GOYAL, D., et al. Evidence-based status of microfracture technique: a systematic review of level I and II studies. Arthroscopy, Sep 2013, 29(9), 1579-1588. (Review of clinical studies)
FONTANA, A., et al. Sustained five-year benefit of autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis for femoral acetabular impingement-induced chondral lesions compared with microfracture treatment. Bone Joint J, May 2015, 97-B(5), 628-635. (Clinical study)
GAO, L., et al. Early loss of subchondral bone following microfracture is counteracted by bone marrow aspirate in a translational model of osteochondral repair. Nature Scientif-ic Reports, 2017, 7:45189, DOI: 10.1038/srep45189 (Pre-clinical study)
FRANK, R.M., et al., Failure of Bone Marrow Stimulation Techniques, Sports Med Arthrosc Rev, 2017, 25 (1) (Review of clinical studies)
STEADMAN, J.R., Microfracture Technique for Full-Thickness Chondral Defects: Technique and Clinical Results. Operative Techniques in Orthopaedics. 1997. 7(4), 300-304. (Clinical study)
KAISER, N., et al. Clinical results 10 years after AMIC in the knee. Swiss Med Wkly, 2015, 145 (Suppl 210), 43S. (Clinical study)
VOLZ, M., et al. A randomized controlled trial demonstrating sustained benefit of Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis over microfracture at five years. Int Orthop, Apr 2017, 41(4), 797-804. (Clinical study)
SCHAGEMANN, J., et al. Mid-term outcome of arthroscopic AMIC for the treatment of articular cartilage defects in the knee joint is equivalent to mini-open procedures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, Jan 22 2018. (Clinical study)
STEINWACHS, M.R.,et al. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Clinical Evidence on the Use of Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis in the Knee. Cartilage. 2019:1947603519870846. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ pubmed/31508990 (Review of clinical studies)
FOSSUM, V., et al. Collagen-Covered Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation Versus Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis: A Randomized Trial Comparing 2 Methods for Repair of Cartilage Defects of the Knee. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine. 019;7(9):2325967119868212. doi.org/10.1177/2325967119868212 (Clinical study)

01/05

1. Arthroscopie: Préparer le champ opératoire

3. Arthroscopie: Préparer la membrane Chondro-Gide®

$4. Arthroscopie: Microfractures$

5. Arthroscopie: Positionner la matrice Chondro-Gide®

7. Arthroscopie: Fixer la membrane Chondro-Gide®

8. Arthroscopie: Retirer le surplus de colle

Utiliser une curette tranchante pour retirer les fragments de cartilage et obtenir une lésion aux bords lisses et verticaux.

Références

SCHIAVONE PANNI, A., et al. Good clinical results with autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (Amic) technique in large knee chondral defects. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2018 Apr 26(4):1130-36 (Clinical study)
WALTHER, M., et al. Scaffold based reconstruction of focal full thickness talar cartilage defects. Clinical Research on Foot & Ankle, 2013, 1-5. (Clinical study)
KAISER, N., et al. Clinical results 10 years after AMIC in the knee. Swiss Med Wkly, 2015, 145 (Suppl 210), 43S. (Clinical study)
VOLZ, M., et al. A randomized controlled trial demonstrating sustained benefit of Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis over microfracture at five years. Int Orthop, Apr 2017, 41(4), 797-804. (Clinical study)
Geistlich Pharma AG data on file (Bench test)
GILLE, J., et al. Cell-Laden and Cell-Free Matrix-Induced-Chondrogenesis versus Microfracture for the Treatment of Articular Cartilage Defects: A Histological and Biomechanical Study in Sheep. Cartilage OnlineFirst, January 7, 2010, doi:10.1177/1947603509358721 (Pre-clinical study)
KRAMER, J., et al. In vivo matrix-guided human mesenchymal stem cells. Cell Mol Life Sci, Mar 2006, 63(5), 616-626. (Clinical study)
MITHOEFER, K., et al. The microfracture technique for the sustained benefit of Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis over microfracture at five years. Int Orthop, Apr 2017, 41(4), 797-804. (Clinical study)
GOYAL, D., et al. Evidence-based status of microfracture technique: a systematic review of level I and II studies. Arthroscopy, Sep 2013, 29(9), 1579-1588. (Review of clinical studies)
FONTANA, A., et al. Sustained five-year benefit of autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis for femoral acetabular impingement-induced chondral lesions compared with microfracture treatment. Bone Joint J, May 2015, 97-B(5), 628-635. (Clinical study)
GAO, L., et al. Early loss of subchondral bone following microfracture is counteracted by bone marrow aspirate in a translational model of osteochondral repair. Nature Scientif-ic Reports, 2017, 7:45189, DOI: 10.1038/srep45189 (Pre-clinical study)
FRANK, R.M., et al., Failure of Bone Marrow Stimulation Techniques, Sports Med Arthrosc Rev, 2017, 25 (1) (Review of clinical studies)
STEADMAN, J.R., Microfracture Technique for Full-Thickness Chondral Defects: Technique and Clinical Results. Operative Techniques in Orthopaedics. 1997. 7(4), 300-304. (Clinical study)
KAISER, N., et al. Clinical results 10 years after AMIC in the knee. Swiss Med Wkly, 2015, 145 (Suppl 210), 43S. (Clinical study)
VOLZ, M., et al. A randomized controlled trial demonstrating sustained benefit of Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis over microfracture at five years. Int Orthop, Apr 2017, 41(4), 797-804. (Clinical study)
SCHAGEMANN, J., et al. Mid-term outcome of arthroscopic AMIC for the treatment of articular cartilage defects in the knee joint is equivalent to mini-open procedures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, Jan 22 2018. (Clinical study)
STEINWACHS, M.R.,et al. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Clinical Evidence on the Use of Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis in the Knee. Cartilage. 2019:1947603519870846. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ pubmed/31508990 (Review of clinical studies)
FOSSUM, V., et al. Collagen-Covered Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation Versus Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis: A Randomized Trial Comparing 2 Methods for Repair of Cartilage Defects of the Knee. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine. 019;7(9):2325967119868212. doi.org/10.1177/2325967119868212 (Clinical study)

01/05

Évidence clinique AMIC® Genou

AMIC® Chondro-Gide® est un traitement à l’efficacité avérée de régénération des lésions cartilagineuses de toutes tailles présentes dans le genou. Les essais cliniques démontrent l’efficacité des traitements par la technique AMIC® Chondro-Gide® , à la fois en mini-open et par arthroscopie, sur une période de plus de 10 ans.¹⁴

Après 2 ans, de meilleurs résultats que la technique des microfractures (MFx) seule

Dans le cadre d'un essai randomisé contrôlé à trois groupes mené sur 47 patients dans 2 centres, une détérioration significative des résultats a été constatée dans les 2 années suivant une intervention MFx seule (sans l’application de Chondro-Gide® ). Les scores de douleur et fonctionnels (scores ICRS et score de Cincinnati modifié) sont restés stables ou se sont améliorés lorsque la technique AMIC® avait été appliquée, tandis que les scores de douleur et fonctionnels se sont dégradés pour le groupe ayant subi une MFx seule.

Références

SCHIAVONE PANNI, A., et al. Good clinical results with autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (Amic) technique in large knee chondral defects. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2018 Apr 26(4):1130-36 (Clinical study)
WALTHER, M., et al. Scaffold based reconstruction of focal full thickness talar cartilage defects. Clinical Research on Foot & Ankle, 2013, 1-5. (Clinical study)
KAISER, N., et al. Clinical results 10 years after AMIC in the knee. Swiss Med Wkly, 2015, 145 (Suppl 210), 43S. (Clinical study)
VOLZ, M., et al. A randomized controlled trial demonstrating sustained benefit of Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis over microfracture at five years. Int Orthop, Apr 2017, 41(4), 797-804. (Clinical study)
Geistlich Pharma AG data on file (Bench test)
GILLE, J., et al. Cell-Laden and Cell-Free Matrix-Induced-Chondrogenesis versus Microfracture for the Treatment of Articular Cartilage Defects: A Histological and Biomechanical Study in Sheep. Cartilage OnlineFirst, January 7, 2010, doi:10.1177/1947603509358721 (Pre-clinical study)
KRAMER, J., et al. In vivo matrix-guided human mesenchymal stem cells. Cell Mol Life Sci, Mar 2006, 63(5), 616-626. (Clinical study)
MITHOEFER, K., et al. The microfracture technique for the sustained benefit of Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis over microfracture at five years. Int Orthop, Apr 2017, 41(4), 797-804. (Clinical study)
GOYAL, D., et al. Evidence-based status of microfracture technique: a systematic review of level I and II studies. Arthroscopy, Sep 2013, 29(9), 1579-1588. (Review of clinical studies)
FONTANA, A., et al. Sustained five-year benefit of autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis for femoral acetabular impingement-induced chondral lesions compared with microfracture treatment. Bone Joint J, May 2015, 97-B(5), 628-635. (Clinical study)
GAO, L., et al. Early loss of subchondral bone following microfracture is counteracted by bone marrow aspirate in a translational model of osteochondral repair. Nature Scientif-ic Reports, 2017, 7:45189, DOI: 10.1038/srep45189 (Pre-clinical study)
FRANK, R.M., et al., Failure of Bone Marrow Stimulation Techniques, Sports Med Arthrosc Rev, 2017, 25 (1) (Review of clinical studies)
STEADMAN, J.R., Microfracture Technique for Full-Thickness Chondral Defects: Technique and Clinical Results. Operative Techniques in Orthopaedics. 1997. 7(4), 300-304. (Clinical study)
KAISER, N., et al. Clinical results 10 years after AMIC in the knee. Swiss Med Wkly, 2015, 145 (Suppl 210), 43S. (Clinical study)
VOLZ, M., et al. A randomized controlled trial demonstrating sustained benefit of Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis over microfracture at five years. Int Orthop, Apr 2017, 41(4), 797-804. (Clinical study)
SCHAGEMANN, J., et al. Mid-term outcome of arthroscopic AMIC for the treatment of articular cartilage defects in the knee joint is equivalent to mini-open procedures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, Jan 22 2018. (Clinical study)
STEINWACHS, M.R.,et al. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Clinical Evidence on the Use of Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis in the Knee. Cartilage. 2019:1947603519870846. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ pubmed/31508990 (Review of clinical studies)
FOSSUM, V., et al. Collagen-Covered Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation Versus Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis: A Randomized Trial Comparing 2 Methods for Repair of Cartilage Defects of the Knee. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine. 019;7(9):2325967119868212. doi.org/10.1177/2325967119868212 (Clinical study)

État fonctionnel dans le temps

La technique AMIC® obtient de meilleurs résultats que la MFx seule 2 ans après l’intervention.

Première méta-analyse de 12 essais de AMIC® Chondro-Gide® portant sur 375 patients

Plus récemment (en 2019), dans la synthèse et méta-analyse systématique de résultats concernant AMIC® , les auteurs ont évalué sur 7 ans des lésions chondrales et ostéochondrales de grade III ou IV placées dans le genou et dont la dimension moyenne était de 4,24 cm².

L’utilisation de la technique AMIC® avec Chondro-Gide® (sur des lésions dont la dimension est supérieure au seuil recommandé pour la technique des microfractures seule) a significativement réduit la douleur et amélioré la fonctionnalité entre les données de départ et la fin du suivi. D’après la méta-analyse, la technique AMIC®avec Chondro-Gide® atténue la douleur et améliore la fonctionnalité des articulations du genou touché par des lésions chondrales ou ostéochondrales, de manière significative. De plus, les résultats montrent que l’amélioration perdurait pendant plus de 5 ans, ce qui confirme l’efficacité d’AMIC® Chondro-Gide^®à long terme pour les lésions plus grandes (> 4 cm²) de grade III ou IV.

Les techniques ACI-C et AMIC® Chondro-Gide® obtiennent des résultats équivalents 2 ans après l’intervention

Fossum et al. (2019) ont mené une étude prospective, randomisée et contrôlée afin d’évaluer les résultats obtenus par les techniques ACI-C et AMIC® sur les lésions chondrales et ostéochondrales du fémur distal et de la patella. À 1 an et à 2 ans, ils n’ont constaté aucune différence significative entre les résultats obtenus par la technique ACI-C et la technique AMIC® .

Les auteurs en ont conclu que AMIC® pouvait être considérée comme l’équivalent clinique de la technique ACI-C. Cependant, la technique AMIC® ne comprenant qu'une seule étape, elle nécessite moins de ressources et représente donc une alternative moins coûteuse.

Références

SCHIAVONE PANNI, A., et al. Good clinical results with autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (Amic) technique in large knee chondral defects. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2018 Apr 26(4):1130-36 (Clinical study)
WALTHER, M., et al. Scaffold based reconstruction of focal full thickness talar cartilage defects. Clinical Research on Foot & Ankle, 2013, 1-5. (Clinical study)
KAISER, N., et al. Clinical results 10 years after AMIC in the knee. Swiss Med Wkly, 2015, 145 (Suppl 210), 43S. (Clinical study)
VOLZ, M., et al. A randomized controlled trial demonstrating sustained benefit of Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis over microfracture at five years. Int Orthop, Apr 2017, 41(4), 797-804. (Clinical study)
Geistlich Pharma AG data on file (Bench test)
GILLE, J., et al. Cell-Laden and Cell-Free Matrix-Induced-Chondrogenesis versus Microfracture for the Treatment of Articular Cartilage Defects: A Histological and Biomechanical Study in Sheep. Cartilage OnlineFirst, January 7, 2010, doi:10.1177/1947603509358721 (Pre-clinical study)
KRAMER, J., et al. In vivo matrix-guided human mesenchymal stem cells. Cell Mol Life Sci, Mar 2006, 63(5), 616-626. (Clinical study)
MITHOEFER, K., et al. The microfracture technique for the sustained benefit of Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis over microfracture at five years. Int Orthop, Apr 2017, 41(4), 797-804. (Clinical study)
GOYAL, D., et al. Evidence-based status of microfracture technique: a systematic review of level I and II studies. Arthroscopy, Sep 2013, 29(9), 1579-1588. (Review of clinical studies)
FONTANA, A., et al. Sustained five-year benefit of autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis for femoral acetabular impingement-induced chondral lesions compared with microfracture treatment. Bone Joint J, May 2015, 97-B(5), 628-635. (Clinical study)
GAO, L., et al. Early loss of subchondral bone following microfracture is counteracted by bone marrow aspirate in a translational model of osteochondral repair. Nature Scientif-ic Reports, 2017, 7:45189, DOI: 10.1038/srep45189 (Pre-clinical study)
FRANK, R.M., et al., Failure of Bone Marrow Stimulation Techniques, Sports Med Arthrosc Rev, 2017, 25 (1) (Review of clinical studies)
STEADMAN, J.R., Microfracture Technique for Full-Thickness Chondral Defects: Technique and Clinical Results. Operative Techniques in Orthopaedics. 1997. 7(4), 300-304. (Clinical study)
KAISER, N., et al. Clinical results 10 years after AMIC in the knee. Swiss Med Wkly, 2015, 145 (Suppl 210), 43S. (Clinical study)
VOLZ, M., et al. A randomized controlled trial demonstrating sustained benefit of Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis over microfracture at five years. Int Orthop, Apr 2017, 41(4), 797-804. (Clinical study)
SCHAGEMANN, J., et al. Mid-term outcome of arthroscopic AMIC for the treatment of articular cartilage defects in the knee joint is equivalent to mini-open procedures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, Jan 22 2018. (Clinical study)
STEINWACHS, M.R.,et al. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Clinical Evidence on the Use of Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis in the Knee. Cartilage. 2019:1947603519870846. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ pubmed/31508990 (Review of clinical studies)
FOSSUM, V., et al. Collagen-Covered Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation Versus Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis: A Randomized Trial Comparing 2 Methods for Repair of Cartilage Defects of the Knee. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine. 019;7(9):2325967119868212. doi.org/10.1177/2325967119868212 (Clinical study)